Hi, Russ Allbery wrote: > Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> writes: > > > [ this time important, because of the upcoming "rejection on lintian > > errors" thing. ] > > You have gotten false information from somewhere. No such thing is > happening or proposed so far as I know.
Oh? http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/07/msg00412.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/07/msg00429.html Oh, you even were the author of the second post yourself. > I think Lintian has no hope of ever being able to figure that out and an > override is appropriate here. The level of makefile parsing required to > understand what the package to do is not really feasible, IMO. True. But then again that argument is constantly brought by people who say why we can't have build-* mandatory (iirc) because it cannot be reliably found out whether the target is there.. > Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [email protected] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
