Hi, Russ Allbery wrote: > Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> writes: > > > No, I do *not* use ucf in this package. > > > > (Though, yes, it's mentioned in three *functions* defined in the source > > but they are not used in this package. > > Again here, Lintian has no real hope of being able to figure this out. > When you're doing unusual things like this, you're going to need to use > overrides.
I don't see how this is uncommon.. And how can't lintian find that out? You probably are able to know when the command appears in a function, and after it you can look whether it's called. "grep" (or something more sophisticated) for it, don't allow () as for the definition. found -> thing used. Besides that, you really want duplication of the command in every maintainer script, thus needing to fix all for a given issue instead of one time : Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [email protected] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
