Vagrant Cascadian <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:56:33PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Lintian doesn't think that either are metapackages because they are >> both arch-dependent and it usually doesn't make any sense for a >> metapackage to be arch-dependent. Why *are* they arch-dependent? > to have architecture-specific dependencies. is this unreasonable for a > metapackage? Hm. Yeah, probably. I'll change Lintian to not care if packages are arch-specific, I think. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
