Frank Lichtenheld <[email protected]> writes: > I think we should consider dropping the unusual-interpreter tag. I > don't think it scales with the archive getting bigger and bigger and > more interpreters showing up.
> We still should do the other checks for known interpreters, but > just not complain about unusual ones. > According to lintian.d.o, which is very current right now, the > stats for the tag are: "19 packages, 33 tags, plus 178 overrides" Hm, I do periodically go through the lintian.d.o report and add new interpreters, although I've been busy lately, and I think the ability to catch typos is very useful. Without that tag, there's no notice that /usr/bin/pelr is a bug. Last time I checked, a lot of the overrides were things that we could fix easily, although I haven't looked recently. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
