Felipe Sateler <[email protected]> writes: > I'm thinking there is no possible way for a program to make sure that > there is a need for a stricter relationship, so at least this should not > be certainty: certain.
It isn't; it's certainty: possible. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
