* Carsten Hey [2010-07-12 20:24 +0200]:
> | } elsif ($operm == 0440 and $file =~ | m,etc/sudoers.d/,) {
>
> Looks like you fixed the bug before I reported it and the false negative
> was caused by generating /etc/sudoers.d/whatever in postinst. Closing.
No, you fixed the "b) exclude /etc/sudoers.d/* from non-standard-file-perm"
part but not "a) add above mentioned check".
Sorry for spamming ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]