Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > Anyway, if you prefer not including runghc, I have really no > problems. I just filed this bug because the lintian warning asked me > to do so.
runhugs is already in there, so it makes sense to add both runghc and runhaskell (an update-alternative(8) alias) to also be listed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100722024928.ga1...@dali
