-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-03-22 07:36, Russ Allbery wrote: > Niels Thykier <[email protected]> writes: > >> Over the weekend I deviced the attached patch; the only thing is that it >> starts nagging users if they miss a versioned B-D for some dh_* command >> they use. This is great when they would also get the pedantic tag, but >> I am not certain how great it is if they get the warning tag for missing >> versions. >> Comments welcome. > > Looks good to me. I wouldn't worry about giving them two warnings, one > for the missing dependency and another for a dependency required for a > specific dh_* command. I think that's only a minor change in behavior and > they're both separate legitimate issues. >
Okay. Btw, do we do a similar thing for the commands[1] (have warning and a pedantic tag) or should I remove commands that are satisfied by compat 7? ~Niels [1] debhelper-script-needs-versioned-build-depends -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNiP7iAAoJEAVLu599gGRCHjsP/iQlJn/4WioYF2lA8cTGJKyl ZZBFXvSjXfu6PSBqnqIfs7M86O8JAT8Lil7MvHm589loMhpAYuga1sDtnarwT+aU j2AJNFZyu6vptAZObiEXDXkwVaz030ouaP7wQx9DFH3PKTWeHcpgDD0Nfb4PaaFT oacJjTEkU+cx2uSD3AAUUGRGixFn24HBKyWxq2ITdZqlJPtKj3oTzguyKX5ekcY4 RYHkhQ/f3J7qqXelHdY4Yt7o/Z0TVCXHPquLtrrvGZbb4kJrZsoVmthDeP5r063p 4oi7c3f9SJhrwcxw/iuKVr33EhZ1VTHG5xWafd34VW7lhNKNy5ZbE7PSp7vvgIoS ZthxTBj/v0FSozT1MUKhfTNvsP9UZ78WVAJ67qvFB7HZ0LbYhlXWhg60iAg2S9j3 2KincngWe6j6OpPydhph2lMGyn6h3fBTAkmZ+3jvsHXGfHdCWrWfeRShbxFtkrIP nRUxYIDDN56bDhKlulCiT6DLxO5QXQAzcbN43L7zPlUl3N6a86xZmZeD1toz9UHH AhZfdfU1DclqLYBF4iWhwAeWcVFRdD4hNv2+cKLquNITWw+yITRmefFDVc/t7rtL 65dIRYuH41xpXe+Q1IPIjmKYJGl1hInlwvVPDONfTXmyNt/XJD4Sm6wJ41IMkhN2 71KG4w9L6s6D5X+rnw5Z =D12v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
