On 2011-07-25 23:22, Russ Allbery wrote: > Niels Thykier <[email protected]> writes: >
Hi First off, sorry hit reply instead of reply-list, but I have bounced the mails to the list as well now. >> Generally I like the output suggestion, so I will go with that. When >> you say that they should only be present "if necessary to disambiguate", >> are we looking at: > >> $ lintian pkg1.dsc pkg2_1.0-1.dsc pkg2_1.0-2.dsc >> W: pkg1 source: some-tag >> W: pkg2 source (1.0-1): some-tag >> W: pkg2 source (1.0-2): some-other-tag > >> Or would that just be versions on all three tags? > > The above is what I think would ideally be best, although I'm not sure how > easy it will be to figure out the necessary information to do that. > Hmm, we could create "sub-groups" inside a group; if there is more than one sub-group, we would know we would need "extended" output format. That being said, I would probably also add a flag for lintian to have it "always on", so tools could just parse the version and architecture directly from the tags instead of needing "-v". ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
