* Jakub Wilk <[email protected]>, 2011-09-08, 01:16:
no-human-maintainers is now a "must" policy violation, so its severity should be bumped to serious.

I forgot to update tests.

--
Jakub Wilk
diff --git a/t/tests/fields-no-human-maintainer/tags b/t/tests/fields-no-human-maintainer/tags
--- a/t/tests/fields-no-human-maintainer/tags
+++ b/t/tests/fields-no-human-maintainer/tags
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-W: fields-no-human-maintainer source: no-human-maintainers
+E: fields-no-human-maintainer source: no-human-maintainers
diff --git a/t/tests/fields-qa-maint-address/tags b/t/tests/fields-qa-maint-address/tags
--- a/t/tests/fields-qa-maint-address/tags
+++ b/t/tests/fields-qa-maint-address/tags
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
+E: fields-qa-maint-address source: no-human-maintainers
 E: fields-qa-maint-address source: wrong-debian-qa-address-set-as-maintainer Debian QA Group <[email protected]>
 E: fields-qa-maint-address: wrong-debian-qa-address-set-as-maintainer Debian QA Group <[email protected]>
-W: fields-qa-maint-address source: no-human-maintainers

Reply via email to