On 2011-10-12 14:56, Niels Thykier wrote:
| On 2011-10-12 13:44, jari wrote:
| > [...]
| >
| > If it were classified "X:" and explanation reads "certainty: not
| > sure", I don't think there is not much problem.
| >
| > Jari
| >
|
| I am not convinced there is a point in implementing this tag if we do
| not take common cases into consideration. I do not want X tags to stay
| experimental forever and I do not consider this proposal (so far) good
| enough to survive as a pedantic/wild-guess.
|
| If we can agree on how we can fairly reliably handle this case without
| too many false-positives, I will consider it. But otherwise I think our
| time is better spent on some of the other 170ish bugs.
This can be handled. Take a look at how gzip(1):
.TH GZIP 1 local
.SH NAME
gzip, gunzip, zcat \- compress or expand files
.SH SYNOPSIS
I guess something like:
1. Parse binary names from (.SH) up till (-)
2. Verify that .IX [if exists] and .TH headers match any of the
found names.
3. Likewise, verify that the beginning of the filename matches any
of the found names.
Jari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
