On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 01:22:28PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Josh Triplett <[email protected]>, 2011-10-15, 18:03: > >>>The "debug" section contains debugging symbols, which should > >>>always have priority extra. Policy specifically mentions them > >>>in the description of priority extra. > >>> > >>>Please consider warning about any packages in section "debug" > >>>with any priority higher than "extra". > >> > >>We do check all packages named *-dbg for that > >>(debug-package-should-be-priority-extra). > > > >Ah, good to know. And it looks like lintian also already checks > >that any package containing debug symbols follows that naming > >convention, which together check that any package containing debug > >symbols has priority extra. :) > > Right, that's debug-package-should-be-named-dbg. > > >Neither of those ensure that such packages have section "debug", > >though. > > There is wrong-section-according-to-package-name, which should > trigger for all *-dbg packages that are not in section "debug".
Oh, awesome, thanks. - Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111016133023.GC11035@leaf
