On 2012-01-23 13:15, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 13:04 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> On a related note, I plotted (part of) the data[1] we got on >> debian-rules-missing-recommended-target tag[2]. The huge increase of >> affected packages in the start can most likely be attributed to this >> full-run[3]. >> >> The second "spike" (around 11/12/01) could be due to reporting now >> handling multiple versions of the same source packages, but I did not >> confirm this guess. > > Interesting, I didn't know you kept historical stats about tags, would > it be possible to have graphs of those and the other stats you keep?
We have data back from about 2011-09-03[1], but for now we are just collecting it. Allegedly there is some untested code somewhere to graph it... speaking of which, Jordà: are there any news on this? Feel free to push a branch or something if you do not have time to finish it. > Something using rrdtool might be interesting. > By the looks of it, the data was designed for use with gnuplot[2]. I also just noticed that the first ~14 of entries are slightly broken in the main stat file[3]. A new column appears just before the last one - I suspect that one is my fault and was caused when I added pedantic tags to lintian.d.o[4]. ~Niels [1] That is the first entry in the stats file. Also, see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-lint-maint/2011/09/msg00010.html [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff;h=6f62677d3742a1eb4823d390d7a4f13a38fd0a67 [3] 1316348790 2.5.3 2153 12930 19532 92 3942 74876 107395 34755 24800 1316360896 2.5.3 2212 15178 26198 92 3942 74876 107395 34755 40991 24800 [4] More precisely: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff;h=b2083db39003356ab7502f9d50773015548a96fb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
