On 2012-03-11 23:29, Russ Allbery wrote: > Niels Thykier <[email protected]> writes: > >> The following tags are no longer emitted by any package in the entire >> archive and I suspect no packager will trigger them. > > [...] >> loads-obsolete-confmodule > > Likewise, these files still exist, so someone could mistakenly use them. > We should drop this tag at the point that debconf stops including them so > scripts will just error out. (Perhaps it's worth suggesting to debconf > that now is the time.) >
I filed a bug for this (#663545), but so far it looks like it will be marked wontfix. I guess this check gets to stay for now. :) >> binary-nmu-uses-old-version-style > > Are we sure that no one is going to do a manual binNMU and not know the > new versioning system? We still do get occasional manual binNMUs. > If we keep it, I think it might be worth asking the FTP people to mark it "(non)fatal". As I recall the multi-arch spec, mixed binNMU styles would be "inconvenient" for M-A: same packages. > [...] I got a branch[1] for the rest that I intend to merge over the weekend, unless there are any objections. ~Niels [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/nthykier/lintian.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/nt-bug-663516 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
