* Jakub Wilk <[email protected]> [120716 14:19]: > * Bernhard R. Link <[email protected]>, 2012-07-16, 13:30: > >+Tag: vcs-field-not-canonical > >+Severity: minor > >+Certainty: possible > >+Info: The VCS-* field contains an uncanonical URI. Please update to use > >+ the current canonical URI instead. > > Who decided which URIs are canonical and which are not?
http requests are answered with 302 (not 301), which says the new one is canonical. The web interfaces (at least gitweb) point to the anonvcs addresses as the canonical way to get those (except for access via ssh). And last but not least those are the one listed in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/05/msg00009.html Bernhard R. Link -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
