Niels Thykier <[email protected]> writes: > On 2012-09-17 00:09, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> 7.8 >> New `Built-Using' field, which must be used to document the >> source packages for any binaries that are incorporated into this >> package at build time. This is used to ensure that the archive >> meets license requirements for providing source for all binaries. >> > No op or do you want a heuristic for guessing if its absent? > Build-Depends =~ /-source/ might be a reasonable starting guess. Ah, hm, that would be interesting. I was thinking no-op, but that might be interesting as an experimental tag. >> 8.6 >> Policy for dependencies between shared libraries and other >> packages has been largely rewritten to document the `symbols' >> system and more clearly document handling of shared library ABI >> changes. `symbols' files are now recommended over `shlibs' files >> in most situations. All maintainers of shared library packages >> should review the entirety of this section. > Sounds like no op except possibly adding/updating references... Yup. >> 9.1.1 >> Packages must not assume the `/run' directory exists or is usable >> without a dependency on `initscripts (>= 2.88dsf-13.3)' until the >> stable release of Debian supports `/run'. > No op? Yeah, I'd call that a no-op. It's pretty hard to figure out if people are using /run. >> 9.11 >> New section documenting general requirements for alternate init >> systems and specific requirements for integrating with upstart. > No op? Definitely a no-op for right now. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
