merge 649530 645696 thanks On 01/01/13 20:33, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Ximin, > > Jakub Wilk wrote: >> * Ximin Luo <[email protected]>, 2011-10-17, 22:35: > >>> Currently the tag "missing-license-text-in-dep5-copyright" is emitted when >>> the copyright file looks like this: >>> >>> ---- >>> Files: * >>> Copyright: yyyy-yyyy etc >>> License: MPL-1.1 or GPL-2+ or LGPL-2.1+ >>> >>> License: MPL-1.1 >>> etc >>> >>> License: GPL-2 >>> etc >>> >>> License: LGPL-2.1 >>> etc > [...] >> I can't see anything in the DEP-5 specification that'd support your >> interpretation. However, if you still feel that this was the intended >> meaning, please file a bug against debian-policy asking for clarification. > > Given the current copyright-format spec, this lintian behavior is > correct. Would you mind if I merge this with bug#649530 or close it? >
Hi, agreed, I'll merge. > Thanks, > Jonathan -- GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0 https://bitbucket.org/infinity0 https://launchpad.net/~infinity0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
