Le 06/03/2013 09:37, Hendrik Tews a écrit :
> In principle I agree, that programs written in a certain subset
> of OCaml do not need these hardening features. However, at the
> moment this safe subset is not even identified...

OCaml has a built-in notion of "unsafe" feature (see ocamlobjinfo
output) that could serve as a starting point for that.


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51370f63.2090...@crans.org

Reply via email to