* Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net>, 2013-04-17, 21:51:
With that in mind, that would be something like:
lintian (>= 2.5.12), lintian (<< 2.5.13~)
If I am not mistaken. We should probably stress the need for "~" in
the upper bound to avoid issues in stable backports.
ACK, it's easy to forget about it. (I did it in lintian4python... /o\)
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130417195832.ga8...@jwilk.net
