On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:03:49PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > So in some cases you _must_not_ use any of these standard names. > > What Lintian could do is to parse the full license text, see if it > matches any standard license, and if it does then emit the tag. But > that's far from trivial to implement.
If only fossology were still in Debian, lintian could then declare a dependency on nomos. Really, though, would you prefer a blacklist instead? lintian could warn on shortnames "BSD", "BSD3", "BSD-2", "BSD (2 clause)", "BSD License", "GPLv2", "GPL (v2 or later)", "MIT" and so on. The lack of any feedback right now is leading to data pollution which makes the machine-readable copyright format not very useful as a machine-readable copyright format. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130523155834.ga31...@scru.org
