Niels Thykier <[email protected]> writes: > In the tag description or the tag "extra"? For the former, the problem > might be that the list is (or could be) architecture dependent. For the > latter, it would need some changes to hardening-info{,-helper} + > c/binaries. But also some consideration to handle 5+ unprotected > functions. Example even the following is getting rather lengthy
> ... hardening-no-fortity-functions path/to/file func1, func2, func3, ... I was thinking the tag extra, just to list the unprotected functions, but it was more a matter of curiosity than anything I think is horribly important. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
