* Osamu Aoki <[email protected]>, 2014-04-05, 23:30:
License: GPL-2.0+ with incorrect FSF address, and with autoconf
exception
FWIW, this line does not conform to the copyright format
specification.
What is the offending part? "GPL-2.0+" or "with ..."?
The latter.
As for "with ..." part, I am following "An exception or clarification
to a license is signalled in plain text, by appending with keywords
exception to the short name."
Later it says “If more than one exception applies to a single license,
an arbitrary short name indicating that combination of multiple
exceptions must be used”, but your name is quite long. ;-P
Now seriously: I don't believe you can use “and” or “or” in the exception
name, because they are used as conjunctions between licenses.
Admittedly, the specification doesn't really say what you _can_ put
between “with” and “exception”, which I think is a bug.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
