On 2015-01-23 16:40, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:05:27 +0100 Johannes Schauer <[email protected]> > wrote: >> one can notice a large number of packages which probably (by their name) >> need an interpreter but do not depend on one: > > Niels Thykier noticed that my numbers include many .*-doc and .*-data > packages. > Here an updated list that does not: > > - python-.*: 18 > - python3-.*: 12 > - jenkins-.*: 8 > - gosa-plugin-.*:13 > - cl-.*: 37 > - .*-perl: 3 > - ruby-.*: 3 > - xul-ext-.*: 7 > - lua-.*: 9 > > Thanks! > > cheers, josch >
There are also some -common and -dev packages, which might not require the interpreter (e.g. for -dev, you probably want something like python-dev rather than python). To avoid too many false positives, we should probably at least start with ignoring (in the general case): ^.*-(?:data|dev|doc|common)$ ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
