Your message dated Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:49:08 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#779436: lintian: /me/ missing on
https://lintian.debian.org/maintainers.html
has caused the Debian Bug report #779436,
regarding lintian: /me/ missing on https://lintian.debian.org/maintainers.html
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
779436: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779436
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.30+deb8u3
Severity: normal
I'm a Debian maintainer maintaining three packages. However, I'm not
listed on https://lintian.debian.org/maintainers.html
Trying out https://lintian.debian.org/full/[email protected]
actually reveals content (however, much less than expected, could
there be something missing?).
Btw. the reason I was looking is that somehow the link from PTS got
missing (there used to be a link to the lintian reports until
recently).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.61sneo.02-grsec (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to de_DE.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii binutils 2.24.90.20141023-1
ii bzip2 1.0.6-7+b2
ii diffstat 1.58-1
ii file 1:5.20-2
ii gettext 0.19.3-2
ii hardening-includes 2.6
ii intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.1
ii libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.29+b2
ii libarchive-zip-perl 1.39-1
ii libclass-accessor-perl 0.34-1
ii libclone-perl 0.37-1+b1
ii libdpkg-perl 1.17.23
ii libemail-valid-perl 1.195-1
ii libfile-basedir-perl 0.03-1
ii libipc-run-perl 0.92-1
ii liblist-moreutils-perl 0.33-2+b1
ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.2.0-1.1
ii libtext-levenshtein-perl 0.11-1
ii libtimedate-perl 2.3000-2
ii liburi-perl 1.64-1
ii man-db 2.7.0.2-5
ii patchutils 0.3.3-1
ii perl [libdigest-sha-perl] 5.20.1-5
ii t1utils 1.38-3+b1
Versions of packages lintian recommends:
pn libperlio-gzip-perl <none>
ii perl 5.20.1-5
ii perl-modules [libautodie-perl] 5.20.1-5
Versions of packages lintian suggests:
pn binutils-multiarch <none>
ii dpkg-dev 1.17.23
ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.71-1+b3
pn libtext-template-perl <none>
ii libyaml-perl 1.13-1
ii xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2+b3
-- no debconf information
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [email protected]
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2015-02-28 19:46, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Niels,
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 06:29:36PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I just realised that it probably won't show up after tomorrow. Your
>> packages seem to only emits I, P, X etc. tags and currently those are
>> (by mistake) not included in the lintian output.
>>
>> I will try to squeeze it into before tomorrows run if possible. But if
>> not, it will probably take several days before your packages will re-appear.
>
> Thanks a lot for your effort!
>
> (And it is not urgent, if it takes a few days it is perfectly ok!).
>
> Greetings
>
> Helge
>
Hi,
I believe this is fixed now and we are "just" waiting for Lintian
reprocess the remaining packages.
~Niels
--- End Message ---
