Sean Whitton <[email protected]> writes: > > CCing David, who wrote the code that adds the Built-Using header, but > I'm pretty sure that it is indeed there for GPL compliance purposes. > > dh-elpa adds emacsen-common maintscripts to packages built using > dh-elpa, and (according to the copyright file of dh-elpa) those scripts > are under the GPL.
Oh, that was not my intent. I just wanted to be able to sort out problems introduced by bad maintainer scripts. It sounds like we should - explicitely permissively license the maintainer scripts - drop the built-using header (perhaps adding a custome header, or just making sure the version info is available other places. d
