On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 02:03:31PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I can believe the same thing about this JavaScript, though. It's not > really that long, an editor is going to hard-wrap the line, and I bet most > changes are just adding an additional condition. > > I'd be inclined to just whitelist this particular file as an oddity.
Though perhaps whitelist just the long line of code; the anki upstream had compressed the header lines to an intial comment at the start of the line of code, so the one-line file read: /* CSS Browser Selector v0.4.0 (Nov 02, 2010) Rafael Lima (http://rafael.adm.br) */function... I've now replaced that with the original upstream version. Best wishes, Julian
