Thanks. I think that will work. Scott K
On Thursday, May 03, 2018 05:48:36 AM Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 897213 + pending > thanks > > > People pay attention to lintian results and so the tags > > should be actionable. > > Indeed, that's convincing enough and I have not heard anything from > doko... :) > > However, instead of removing it I've marked the tag as > "experimental" and with a "pedantic" severity, thus essentially > hiding it from 99.999% of Lintian users (yet allowing us to continue > to continue collect statistics and make it easier to re-introduce > later) > > I also updated the tag description to say: > > You should not make any changes to your package based on this > presence of this tag. > > The full changes are here: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/e6ea8c5c7c06c1a1143d738be24 > ddc6f6a6d5934 > > checks/python.desc | 12 ++++++------ > debian/changelog | 6 ++++++ > t/tests/python-python2-apps/desc | 2 ++ > t/tests/python-python2-apps/tags | 12 ++++++------ > t/tests/scripts-control-interpreters/desc | 1 - > t/tests/scripts-control-interpreters/tags | 2 -- > t/tests/scripts-interpreters/tags | 2 +- > t/tests/scripts-missing-dep-fp/desc | 2 -- > t/tests/scripts-missing-dep-fp/tags | 1 - > 9 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > Best wishes,
