Paul Wise <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 19:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I just now checked, and the packages currently diagnosed with this >> tag [1] are 100% false positives, which makes me wonder if this tag >> should just be deleted. > I haven't confirmed this, but if true, go ahead. For the record, the methodology I used was to assume that all the packages with a specific MTA in the package name were not generic. (Most of those appear to be packages built by the same MTA source package, although a few are plugins for specific MTAs.) I then looked at the descriptions of all remaining packages. Each of them called out the specific MTA in their description. They all fell into two classes: either they were add-ons for a specific MTA (mostly Postfix, although there was one exim4 add-on), or they were virtual server managers or control panels or something similar that (per the package description) could only configure specific MTAs (generally Postfix). -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
