On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 23:07:50 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > I'd request that no more such tag names be added, and ideally the > > current ones be renamed, although the longer they stay the more > > overrides they might accumulate. :/ > > That's my only concern at this point. I mean, there's probably > countless debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature overrides. > > I wonder… Lintian could have a small list of aliases used only for > overrides?
I don't think this is a problem anymore after the renamed-tags support was added. Which maps the override tag to the new name and does not even emit a tag of its own for this. I think this is the most inobtrusive way to handle any such mass rename w/o bothering maintainers about it. Perhaps it might be nice to eventually emit a pedantic tag or similar, but I don't think this should be a blocker on any mass tag naming cleanup TBH. Thanks, Guillem
