Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > [..] I just think that lintian should be less pro-active at adding
> > checks for things that are far from accepted.
>
> That is why I propose introducing concept of "controversial" checks.
I think we are all violently agreeing here.
> Having Lintian plainly reject such proposals would mean need in creation
> of something like "lintian-unofficial"
(Personally, I doubt someone would fork Lintian, more likely its
output would become less and less "trusted". But both outcomes suck.)
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` [email protected] 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
