[Adding [email protected] to CC for visibility]
Hi Michael,
> The underlying issue is still that this test is currently way too
> primitive and produces too many false positives to be actually useful.
> In #931889 I already listed some cases, where those false-positives are
> triggered.
Nod, and I ACK there is still further discussion to be had in
this area.
As I plan to release a new version of Lintian very soon (which will
close the "pending" #931889...) let us keep this one (ie. #933109)
open so this issue does not get lost.
Thank you for caring about Lintian. :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` [email protected] 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
