Thanks for adding this tag. Some packages use 'dh $*' (rather than 'dh $@') in their %: target, they currently get tagged with no-dh-sequencer.
ISTR there were other reasons why $@ is preferred over $*, but that should probably be a separate tag.
Thanks for adding this tag. Some packages use 'dh $*' (rather than 'dh $@') in their %: target, they currently get tagged with no-dh-sequencer.
ISTR there were other reasons why $@ is preferred over $*, but that should probably be a separate tag.