> > Paul Wise <[email protected]> > > It also seems unlikely shellcheck would add a bridge between Haskell > > and Perl of the kind needed to implement custom checks. > > I don't think such a thing is needed, shellcheck already provides > multiple machine-readable output formats, which is the way IDEs > integrate with it. Would you happen to be thinking about some usecase > that is not covered by this?
Just noticed you were talking about custom checks, as I mentioned in the last part of my previous email, I think custom checks are an extra, so this requirement could be dropped (though I'm not the person working on this) and the default checks could be implemented. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique <samueloph>
