On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:27:51PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:09:36PM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: > > > available in binary form only. In this case You should use binary > > kernel from redhat or suse. Yes, even in this case You can take > > appropriate kernel source and compile kernel modules, but this is > > addition work. > > I don't know, may be redhat like debian have squashfs modules in > separate package.
They don't. Squashfs and unionfs are only supported by third parties; in fact, I still have not managed to get CentOS 4 to support squashfs. -- Trent Buck
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debian-live-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-live-devel
