El sáb, 06-10-2007 a las 19:46 +0200, Daniel Baumann escribió: > [ replied to the list, as it is probably interesting for other people too. ] > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 06:44:14PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > >> Peter Skogström wrote: > >>> Im building on sid with live-helpe1.0~a30-1 > >> for sid, are you using aufs now? > > Is that the recommended way now or is it a workaround or ?? > > for 2.6.22, there is currently no matching unionfs available in Debian. > > I'll upgrade to unionfs 2.x soon, so that you can choose between aufs > and unionfs, but for the moment, you have to use aufs. >
If you are interested in using unionfs with 2.6.22 kernels I have made some patches. I'm running thin clients with unionfs+squashfs with 2.6.22-2-486 without problems. http://trac.tcosproject.org/browser/trunk/tcos-extra-modules/patches NOTE: tcos-extra-modules package build unionfs, squashfs, aufs, sis7019 and cdfs in unstable: http://www.tcosproject.org/pool/main/t/tcos-extra-modules/ Greetings -- http://soleup.eup.uva.es/mariodebian
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ debian-live-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-live-devel
