On 15/04/08 at 10:51 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > While Debian Live is really nice, some things could be improved about > > it. Each time I wanted to use it, I ran into an issue that required > > going to IRC to ask how to work around the problem (the problem was > > always already known). > > as you know, debian testing and unstable are in flux and depends heavily > on the maintainers ability to fix core packages for debian-live (e.g. > kernel-modules). if those are broken, debian-live is broken. > > > It would really be a good thing to have tested snapshots (in addition > > to the daily builds, which are not guaranteed to work AFAIK), so people > > could just download images, write them to an USB stick, and enjoy. We > > don't need to have perfectly up-to-date tested snapshots. Updating them > > every 2-3 months would clearly be enough. > > see ml; images are back on live.d.n, whereas *-builds/ are autobuilds > and release/ are manually tested images (though release is currently > rsyncing in).
Oh ok, release/ was empty when I wrote that mail. Great news, thank you :-) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | _______________________________________________ debian-live-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-live-devel
