On 03/06/2008, Jordi Pujol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Tuesday 03 June 2008 18:13:18 Daniel Baumann va escriure: > > > Extra prod to Jordy :) As you pointed out several times, you're using > > several patches for live-initramfs. Please do send them in. > > > > Hello all, > > Thanks Daniel, > Now already there are large differences between the estandard and my own > version of live-initramfs. Also it requires a personalized initramfs-tools > package. > These differences dificult the task of creating patches. > I will try to send simplest patches so that can be applied with easy to the > current version of live-initramfs, > > Attached is the first one, > The function setup_loop() is simplified for speed and more clear code; > observing than losetup from Busybox v1.9 has the option -f to print the name > of the next loop device available,
This sounds nice. However, what happens if there is a non-busybox losetup installed? Since live-initramfs now recommends loop-aes-utils (or whateve the exact name), and they install their own losetup I had to fix up setup_loop to work for cases when the image is readonly. Thanks Michal _______________________________________________ debian-live-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-live-devel
