Chris Lamb wrote: > Indeed. For completeness sake, in the case of /etc/skel, is this really an > issue? Whatever uid/gid combination the files in /etc/skel have, adduser > appears to chown them to the target user.
in case of /etc/skel, live-helper should chown them to root for cosmetical reasons anyway. for any other includes... > However, I can't help thinking that having random files in the binary image > that are owned by random users by default is a bad idea: ...i *personally* would consider this worse than have to adjust certain files manually with a hook where they shouldn't be owned by root. > For example, I created a local "config/chroot_local-includes/etc/sudoers" > file (owned by my local user, uid 1000), this file would--by default--exist > on the binary image with the same permissions. Sounds dangerous. for such limited special files, chroot_hacks should make sure they have the right permissions. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
