Keith Parker wrote: > If that line is uncommented, geda gets installed (gschem works), but > kate goes away
you need to give information about what apt is saying when it is doing that. also note, that this has not anything to do with debian-live, but with how package have depends. therefore, you'll be able to see/fix the exact same sitation on a normal installation as well. > I tried using tee to capture the output to look for helpful messages > but the file ended up over 3 MBytes long. please bzip2 it and upload it somewhere for inspection. > I suspect due to the interactive progress displays. (which is soon to be fixed in a newer squashfs upload in sid) > How do I disable the progress displays to keep the tee file size manageable? currently not supported directly, but you could add a '--no-progress' parameter to the squashfs call in lh_binary_rootfs. > How do I recognize that there is a problem with a package/package list? by parsing the logfile manually. > Also, how do I know when I should be using -p vs. --packages? -p are packages lists, --packages are individual packages. > It is my assumption that the ORDER of specifying packages should be > IRRELEVANT. > Am I wrong about this? as far as i know, but i may be very well wrong and you should check with the apt developers about it (or aptitude in case you use aptitude), that the order (unfortunately) doesn't matter. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [email protected] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
