On 12/10/10 06:09 AM, Vitaly wrote: > Okay, I admit bad joke with a man lh config. > However, this does not eliminate the illogical and not intuitive man > lh_config and man lb_config > And so carefully did not want to see here. > As an example > > gedit -> g_edit -> g edit -> s edit > and man s_edit > would be very logical to the precepts of your mom?
If you are saying you don't like (or understand) the rename of the command multiple times, sorry, that's just one of the costs of development. As a developer, an idea you at first thought was good (filling /usr/bin with a whole bunch of helpers which, in practice, are not called by the user individually) later turns out to be bad (i.e. pollution of /usr/bin is not very kind!) At around the same time you decide that the original name of the thing you wrote, live-helper, (which undoubtedly was influenced by the prior existence of 'debhelper' and you can see parallels in the structure,) is no longer really descriptive of the purpose of the software. Helper? Helper for what? So you decide to rename it to live-build, because it's the part of the software that *builds* the live image. Much clearer now, yes? So what would you ask us to do? Get all of our ideas perfect the very first time? Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
