2011/1/2 joseangon <[email protected]>: > > > 2011/1/2 Daniel Baumann <[email protected]> > > Hola. > > >> On 01/02/2011 01:33 PM, joseangon wrote: >> > We in Musix, with d-i custom, we work right the usb-hdd mode >> > installation. Just had to incorporate the grub2 in the package list. >> >> thanks, however, forcing the inclusion of grub2 into the binary image is >> imho not an acceptable way for the official images to workaround the bug >> in d-i. >> > > Ok, but if you look there are inconsistencies in the grub of binary > packages: > > /pool/main/g/grub/grub_0.97-64_i386.deb > /pool/main/g/grub2 > /pool/main/g/grub2/grub-common_1.98+20100804-11_i386.deb > /pool/main/g/grub2/grub-pc_1.98+20100804-11_i386.deb > > And the apt says: > > $ apt-cache policy grub-pc > grub-pc: > Instalados: 1.98+20100804-10 > Candidato: 1.98+20100804-10 > > $ apt-cache policy grub-common > grub-common: > Instalados: 1.98+20100804-10 > Candidato: 1.98+20100804-10 > > $ apt-cache search grub-pc > grub-legacy - GRand Unified Bootloader (Legacy version) > grub - GRand Unified Bootloader (dummy package) > grub-pc - GRand Unified Bootloader, version 2 (PC/BIOS version) > > Where is the grub-pc, grub-common to grub-legacy ? > > That led me to think it was not possible to install if it was only with the > grub2. >
These inconsistencies will be at cdrom version and work. I guess there is something more. :-?? Bye. -- José Luis Zabalza jlz.3008 a t gmail.com Linux Counter 172551 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
