Greetings, On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:04 PM, carolus <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/13/2011 11:18 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: >> >> On 03/13/2011 03:59 PM, Charles Russell wrote: >>> >>> I encountered the following error message using a combination of >>> packages for which the component packages each worked separately: "E: >>> Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with >>> --fix-missing?" >> >> during this weekends ftp-master meeting, at some time, the >> testing/unstable archives were inconsistent and thus not installable from. >> >> in general, if you encounter errors on the testing/unstable >> distributions, we would appreciate if you make the research and verify >> e.g. with a local build first. remember, testing/unstable's target >> audience is not end-users and anything from slight inconveniences up to >> total breakages can happen basically at any time. >> > I don't think this was testing/unstable: > > LB_BINARY_IMAGES="iso-hybrid" > LB_DISTRIBUTION="squeeze" > LB_PACKAGES_LISTS="lxde" > LB_TASKS="build-essential" > LB_PACKAGES="vim make gdb gfortran openssh-server mc splint exuberant-ctags > cflow indent iceweasel wpasupplicant wireless-tools ccrypt squashfs-tools > gnuplot wget maxima maxima-share maxima-doc xmaxima octave3.2 octave3.2-doc > octave3.2-headers octave3.2-info r-base" > > r-base was the straw that broke the camel's back, but it worked OK with a > smaller package list. >
I am assuming you used l-b cgi to build. When you use that interface, it is always helpful to post the link to the log file for everyone to examine. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
