On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:00:17 -0700 Kash <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually I removed it because it was not needed for our environment and if > you read the previous discussion I mentioned that this is a working code for > bootif only. Regardless, I'll send in another patch, adding in the code that > I removed, and it will fall back to it in case bootif is not available. Not really my call. i am working on a setup to reproduce the issue either way.
I should be able to understand why the old code fails at least. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110904153827.0482134d@bigguy
