> no; this will not fix sandros problem; sandros problem lies most likely in > syslinux-themes-ubuntu. correct, misread the original email.
> i could not reproduce the problem neither on debian nor ubuntu that the > mentioned patch tries to fix, and, since it creates further 'problems'[0], i > prefered to not apply it. my claim still is that the patch is not necessary > at all, so far nobody could show the opposite. this is what I get in binary/casper without the patch: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4991707 2012-08-12 18:37 initrd.img-3.0.0-16-generic -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14750751 2012-08-12 18:37 initrd.img-3.2.0-29-generic -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14757956 2012-08-12 18:37 initrd.img-3.2.0-29-generic-pae -rw------- 1 root root 4855200 2012-08-12 18:37 vmlinuz-3.2.0-29-generic -rw------- 1 root root 5010176 2012-08-12 18:37 vmlinuz-3.2.0-29-generic-pae where 3.0.0.16-generic is the host kernel. You may argue it does not harm if a proper syslinux theme is referencing the good binaries, but at least it affects the image size significantly without a "cleaning" hook Luigi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cafwmc2bsnxh94o3z2v-r+cirf6uu7ypzmsg7km6pxmut2ce...@mail.gmail.com
