On 17 December 2012 22:17, Daniel Baumann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/17/2012 10:03 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: >> If sincere interest arises in HFS (without "+") and Debian arch "powerpc", >> then one >> could at least begin to make a plan there. > > personally, i couldn't care less about powerpc, to me it's a dead arch. > if there would be (more than one) user demand, that might be different, > but currently.. there's not even that. personally, i think it's a waste > of time. ymmv. >
I used to use a macppc machine. It was slow. It's going to get only slower, comparatively. Today phones are several orders of magnitude faster. Or more precisely they have better blanced architecture for desktop use. You can get phone with the display resolution of said macppc machines. There were G5 tower machines which should be still usable by today standards but they are quite rare. The power architecture was shortly available in PS3 and is still available in server hardware and possibly in some Cell based products if any other than PS3 exist. That's not macppc, however, and does not require a HFS filesystem to run. Thanks Michal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOMqctQ1zYL5R3eph=mthd72x4t+p-bjvvdpurrf7k+cgcf...@mail.gmail.com
