There should be 8 files in the previous message. Please let me know if they are there, if they aren't I'll link to them in my dropbox.
On 4 October 2014 13:24, Michael . <[email protected]> wrote: > The build just failed with the same error. > > On 4 October 2014 09:44, Michael . <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Last paragraph first. >> >> The meaning of the last paragraph is simply On my laptop I have multiple >> installs of Jessie (MATE, Gnome, LXDE, XFCE, KDE) >> each with Live build. Not one of them has worked for me. I have multiple >> installs of Wheezy (same DEs as Jessie) >> with LB 3.x and it works fine. >> >> I'm apologise for the confusion with regards to everything else. I'm >> hoping this new build on Jessie (MATE) either works >> or gives a better indication what is going wrong. Either way I will >> report back. >> >> On 4 October 2014 08:55, Ben Armstrong <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 03/10/14 07:36 PM, Michael . wrote: >>> > I have to ask the question that if you saw the email of August 7 yet >>> > the configs >>> > didn't come through why didn't anyone say so and ask for them? >>> >>> I couldn't find the email of August 7th at all. But I did see you quote >>> it (but without the configs in it) earlier today. The first answer you >>> got was from Baurzhan asking you to post the configs. That was your >>> first clue. >>> >>> > and why after >>> > checking the list yourself and finding they are not there are you >>> > telling me to try >>> > and check the list to see if they are there? I don't doubt your word >>> > on the matter. >>> > I am happy to oblige as best as I can but I can't help those who are >>> > helping >>> > me if the entire email gets ignored just because gmail or the list >>> > software >>> > dropped the attachments. >>> >>> I'm thinking it's the entire email that got ignored. Possibly *because* >>> of the attachment? That might have raised the spam score. But the reason >>> I asked you to check the archive is because that's a useful cross-check >>> if you see that people are confused asking for information you thought >>> you already provided ... could save you time in future should this >>> situation arise again. Try including the configs inline in your email >>> next time, not as attachments. >>> >>> > The build you tested fine was built on the web builder, mine are built >>> > on my laptop. >>> >>> It shouldn't matter what the build platform is. It's the same software >>> and should yield the same results, given the same config. >>> >>> > I do not doubt you are able to build successfully and I would hope >>> > with software that >>> > is stable that you and Daniel at least are able to but I haven't and >>> > this is not a competition >>> > between you and I. >>> >>> Eh? I was just dividing between possible causes, not competing. If I can >>> build and you can't, you either don't have the latest (but you say you >>> do, so let's rule that out) or your config is broken (looking more like >>> the real reason, but we'll see it soon, so I await your further email on >>> the topic). >>> >>> > You can be ahead of me, I don't want to be ahead of anyone I >>> > asked ages ago for a little help not for a competition. >>> >>> You've missed my meaning entirely, I meant only "ahead" not as in a >>> competition, but in the sense that I have managed to get a result that >>> was further along the journey from "1. create a config", "2. build >>> successfully", "3. boot successfully" ... you're apparently still stuck >>> at step 1, so let's focus on what's wrong there once we see your config. >>> >>> > I have multiple wheezy installs >>> > to work on Live Build 3.x and I have multiple Jessie installs to work >>> > on Live Build 4.x. >>> > I am yet to get a successful build with 4.x . I am hoping this new >>> > one works but if it >>> > doesn't I will give you as much info as you require. >>> >>> I'm confused by this last paragraph, which seems to contradict itself: >>> "I have multiple Jessie installs to work on Live Build 4.x" and "I am >>> yet to get a successful build with 4.x" ... is there some typo here, or >>> some shade of meaning that differentiates the two that I missed? >>> >>> Ben >>> >>> >>> >> >
