Jeff Licquia writes... > I've begun collecting updates to woody that fix LSB conformance issues, > and my most recent reports have been made with the updates applied. My > current goal is to have a system with woody/sarge + security + my > updates that can pass the LSB test suite.
Cool. > Then, long-term, we can look > at those updates and decide which are acceptable for inclusion in Debian > and which aren't, and take any action needed to fix the unacceptable > ones. > > My updates take two forms: > > - Apt repositories, with source, at: > > deb[-src] http://hackers.progeny.com/~licquia/lsb/apt/ woody/ > deb[-src] http://hackers.progeny.com/~licquia/lsb/apt/ sarge/ > > - A patch repository, at: > > http://hackers.progeny.com/~licquia/lsb/patches/ I have added links to the above to the tracking page I'm maintaining. Let me know if you want me to change it or add anything else. > (Matt T: I don't mean to steal your thunder, but I needed this to make > progress on my own work. Hey no problem we need to make progress. > If you'd like, we can work together on a > combined set of LSB repositories, or I can defer to you when yours comes > out, or whatever. Contact me if you have questions.) I think they will serve different purposes, yours currently has patched packages to improve runtime compliance, I'm planning on providing backports of the lsb* packages. I plan to update the lsbdev package this week in unstable and then I'll backport everything and setup a repository. Thanks, -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
