On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:48:19AM +1000, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > If we can get a consensus for FHS 2.3 before the LSB 2.0 cut off (in a > couple of weeks) then the intent is to include it for LSB 2.0.
Err, that's wildly premature, given the nature of a few of those changes. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Australian DMCA (the Digital Agenda Amendments) Under Review! -- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/copyright/digitalagenda
pgpFkHHHnVgKU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
