Jeff Licquia writes... > It appears that the tests now all depend on glibc 2.3.5. Was this > deliberate?
I assume you mean the test binaries themselves, and not what they are testing for. While I guess it would be ok for the tests to be built against the same ABIs in the version of the LSB they are testing for (since you should have that ABI present if you're testing) but I think it would be nice if the tests were built against something older for the people who knowingly have older ABIs and want to run the tests anyway to see where work is needed. Can someone from the upstream LSB test group comment on this? > If so, is it legitimate for people trying to test Debian sarge (which > only has 2.3.2) to override these dependencies? The cert program will probably not like it, but I think it's legit for working on getting compliant. Of course the tests really should be LSB compliant packages in which case they'd depend on a version of the LSB and not on particular versions of implementions of the ABIs. -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
