Your message dated Wed, 7 Mar 2012 19:30:13 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: lsb-base: ugly output
has caused the Debian Bug report #338556,
regarding lsb-base: ugly output
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
338556: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338556
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lsb-base
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: wishlist
Now that they use the functions in /lib/lsb/init-functions, the output from many
initscripts now looks like this:
Thu Nov 10 18:48:02 2005: .
Thu Nov 10 18:48:02 2005: findfs: Unable to resolve 'LABEL=USBDISK'
Thu Nov 10 18:48:02 2005: Activating swap...
Thu Nov 10 18:48:02 2005: .
Thu Nov 10 18:48:02 2005: Checking root file system.../dev/hda3: clean,
161071/7389184 files, 989657/14755702 blocks
Thu Nov 10 18:48:02 2005: .
Thu Nov 10 18:48:02 2005: Cleaning up ifupdown...done.
Thu Nov 10 18:48:03 2005: Calculating module dependencies...done.
Thu Nov 10 18:48:03 2005: Loading modules...
Thu Nov 10 18:48:03 2005: snd-via82xx
Thu Nov 10 18:48:04 2005: Setting up ALSA....
Thu Nov 10 18:48:04 2005: snd-pcm-oss
Thu Nov 10 18:48:04 2005: snd-mixer-oss
Thu Nov 10 18:48:04 2005: lp
Thu Nov 10 18:48:04 2005: All modules loaded.
Thu Nov 10 18:48:04 2005: Setting the System Clock using the Hardware Clock as
reference
Thu Nov 10 18:48:06 2005: System Clock set. Local time: Thu Nov 10 23:48:06 UTC
2005
Thu Nov 10 18:48:06 2005: .
Thu Nov 10 18:48:06 2005: Checking all file systems.../dev/hda1: clean, 36/8032
files, 7018/32098 blocks
Thu Nov 10 18:48:06 2005: .
Thu Nov 10 18:48:06 2005: Setting kernel variables ...
Thu Nov 10 18:48:06 2005: ... done.
Thu Nov 10 18:48:06 2005: Mounting local filesystems.../dev/hda1 on /boot type
ext3 (rw)
Thu Nov 10 18:48:06 2005: .
etc. (this is from /var/log/boot, the actual output doesn't have the date+time
prefix,
but the line breaks are the same)
Is this actually mandated by LSB? I can't believe that. If yes, Debian shold
just ignore it IMHO
and return to the old way (which I think was specified in policy?) with the
dots and "done." on
the same line as the announcement.
I have checked #321954 but my complaint is about many, perhaps all, scripts
which use these
lsb functions, it is not an exception for one package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-10custom1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages lsb-base depends on:
ii ncurses-bin 5.4-9 Terminal-related programs and man
ii sed 4.1.2-8 The GNU sed stream editor
lsb-base recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.2+Debian30
Le mercredi, 7 mars 2012 18.13:49, Ian Zimmerman a écrit :
> This has been fixed for some time.
Thanks; hence marking as such in the version currently in unstable.
Cheers.
OdyX
--- End Message ---
